<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wordsupply: Writing, Publishing, and Social Media Services &#187; E-news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wordsupply.com/category/e-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wordsupply.com</link>
	<description>Writing, Publishing, and Social Media Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 10:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ten Years Later, Mass E-Mail Is Still Perilous</title>
		<link>http://wordsupply.com/2009/02/27/ten-years-later-mass-e-mail-is-still-perilous/</link>
		<comments>http://wordsupply.com/2009/02/27/ten-years-later-mass-e-mail-is-still-perilous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David McClintock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E-news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordsupply.com/blog/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In December 1999 (almost ten years ago), I wrote a piece about e-mail newsletters, for the Publishers Marketing Association&#8217;s newsletter (now called The Independent, by the org now called the Independent Book Publishers Association, http://www.ibpa-online.org).
&#8220;The Promise and Pitfalls of E-mail Newsletters&#8221; told the story of Paul and Freddie, small press editors who accidentally sent a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In December 1999 (almost ten years ago), I wrote a piece about e-mail newsletters, for the Publishers Marketing Association&#8217;s newsletter (now called <em>The Independent,</em> by the org now called the Independent Book Publishers Association, <a href="http://www.ibpa-online.org" target="_blank">http://www.ibpa-online.org</a>).</p>
<p>&#8220;<a href="http://www.wordsupply.com/writing-for-work/9912-promise-email.html">The Promise and Pitfalls of E-mail Newsletters</a>&#8221; told the story of Paul and Freddie, small press editors who accidentally sent a newsletter with recipients exposed in the To field rather than hidden in the BCC field.  Worse, they accidentally sent an apology e-mail three times.</p>
<p>As I refresh the <a href="http://www.wordsupply.com">Wordsupply site</a>, I was tempted to archive this essay.  Trouble with e-mail newsletters seems so quaint now.</p>
<p>But then, last week, one of the most talked-about Web 2.0 start-ups misfired a mass e-mail.  (No point in mentioning its name &#8211; the point is that the times have not changed.)</p>
<p>Sending an HR rejection e-mail, the company accidentally revealed all recipients in the To field &#8211; including some who no doubt were applying confidentially.  (The CEO apologized by e-mail &#8211; tactfully, and only <span style="font-style:italic;">once</span> :o)</p>
<p>No matter how technologically sophisticated we become, we&#8217;re prone to human error.  The same management safeguards apply &#8211; adding oversight that&#8217;s commensurate with the risk of misfiring the message.  As our tools get more powerful, that risk will increase.</p>
<p>As I wrote in that pre-dot-com-bomb piece, I have certainly suffered my own communications doozies, and will again, for sure.  In the meantime, I will leave that essay <a href="http://www.wordsupply.com/writing-for-work/9912-promise-email.html">online</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wordsupply.com/2009/02/27/ten-years-later-mass-e-mail-is-still-perilous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
